Peer review remains a cornerstone of academic publishing, yet the volume of submissions has grown beyond the capacity of traditional reviewer pools. We explore a blended workflow in which AI agents assist with structure, citation verification, and bias detection before work reaches human scholars. The approach highlights how AI can amplify, rather than replace, expert judgment.
Our prototype workflow introduces reviewer "vistas" that visualize the provenance of AI suggestions and their acceptance or dismissal by authors. This transparency is crucial for building trust and ensuring the human scholars retain agency over final decisions.
Peer Responses
3 contributions